 |
|
 |
Hiring
mistakes can be costly, both in time and money. Zubair Travel Service
helps clients improve the accuracy of hiring decisions through the use
of SelecSys, our proprietary compatibility assessment tool. Using SelecSys
gives clients additional information and insight into their job candidates,
helping them make the best possible hiring decisions.
|
 |
 |
 |
The
SelecSysSM
Process :
|
 |
|
| |
Job
Profile: Zubair Travel Service provides clients with a simple
survey form consisting of questions about the position. Following analysis
of this data, a custom job profile that defines the traits of the ideal
candidate is generated.
|
| |
|
| |
Candidate
Profile: The next step is to measure the personality traits
of prime candidates. After the candidates complete the profile form, an
analysis of the data determines their personality profiles.
|
| |
|
| |
Profile
Comparison Chart: SelecSys then matches the two profiles to
show how closely candidates profiles fit the ideal job profile. In this
way, a quick, accurate compatibility assessment is obtained for each candidate.
|
| |
|
| |
Behavior-based
Interviews: To increase the accuracy of the results, SelecSys
provides behavior-based questions to ask during the interview process.
Based on the premise that past behavior is the best predictor of future
performance, these questions focus on a candidate's specific, work-related
job experiences and give an accurate indication of the candidate's future
behavior and likelihood of success.
|
| |
|
| |
On-going
Feedback: Even after candidates are hired, SelecSys continues
to give feedback about their interaction with co-workers, SelecSys also
measures the results of entire teams to improve their interaction, communication
and productivity.
|
| |
|
| |
Benefits
of Using SelecSys:
|
| |
|
| |
Fair assessment of
candidate skills
|
| |
Lower interviewer bias
|
| |
Candidate's positive
feeling about the interview
|
| |
Legally Defensible
|
| |
Better hiring decisions
|
| |
More predictable employee
performance
|
| |
Better evaluation of
candidate comparisons
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|